Difference between revisions of "Frame Designs"
(→Frame Designs) |
(→Goal) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Goal== | ==Goal== | ||
| − | + | Two different designs: | |
| − | by students using tools found in a home shop. | + | #A low cost load cell mounting system for 1, 2 or 4 load cells for a mass produced and sold as a consumer product. |
| + | #A load cell mounting system that can be built from readily available materials by students using tools found in a home shop. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Many interesting and innovative designs have been suggested, built and tested. | ||
==Designs== | ==Designs== | ||
Revision as of 18:44, 16 March 2017
Goal
Two different designs:
- A low cost load cell mounting system for 1, 2 or 4 load cells for a mass produced and sold as a consumer product.
- A load cell mounting system that can be built from readily available materials by students using tools found in a home shop.
Many interesting and innovative designs have been suggested, built and tested.
Designs
Several frames have been designed, each with advantages and disadvantages:
- Punched and bent
- Welded Steel Rectangular Tubing
- Progressive die stamped and welded
- Unistrut/SuperStrut
- 3D printed corner brackets/metal tubing
- Frameless (2 rails) using strut
- Octanorm aluminum extrusion with torx cam locks
- Vacuum Forming: A Plastic/Aluminum Hybrid Frame
- Ultimate Bottom Board: Utilizing a Manufactured Frame with Aluminum Undercarrage
- Thrifty-Bee Scale: A Low-Cost All Aluminum Scale
