Difference between revisions of "Frame Designs"

From HiveTool
Jump to: navigation, search
(Goal)
(Goal)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Goal==
+
==Goals==
 
Two different designs:
 
Two different designs:
 
#A low cost load cell mounting system for 1, 2 or 4 load cells for a mass produced and sold as a consumer product.  
 
#A low cost load cell mounting system for 1, 2 or 4 load cells for a mass produced and sold as a consumer product.  
 
#A load cell mounting system that can be built from readily available materials by students using tools found in a home shop.
 
#A load cell mounting system that can be built from readily available materials by students using tools found in a home shop.
 +
 +
*light weight
 +
*durable (won't rust, rot, or  become brittle)
 +
  
 
Many interesting and innovative designs have been suggested, built and tested.
 
Many interesting and innovative designs have been suggested, built and tested.

Revision as of 20:00, 16 March 2017

Goals

Two different designs:

  1. A low cost load cell mounting system for 1, 2 or 4 load cells for a mass produced and sold as a consumer product.
  2. A load cell mounting system that can be built from readily available materials by students using tools found in a home shop.
  • light weight
  • durable (won't rust, rot, or become brittle)


Many interesting and innovative designs have been suggested, built and tested.

Designs

Several frames have been designed, each with advantages and disadvantages:

  1. Punched and bent
  2. Welded Steel Rectangular Tubing
  3. Progressive die stamped and welded
  4. Unistrut/SuperStrut
  5. 3D printed corner brackets/metal tubing
  6. Frameless (2 rails) using strut
  7. Octanorm aluminum extrusion with torx cam locks
  8. Vacuum Forming: A Plastic/Aluminum Hybrid Frame
  9. Ultimate Bottom Board: Utilizing a Manufactured Frame with Aluminum Undercarrage
  10. Thrifty-Bee Scale: A Low-Cost All Aluminum Scale